Insurers
Grumble Over State's Moldy Homes
Jeff Harrington, The St. Petersburg Times,
South Pinellas Edition, Feb 3, 2005. pg. 1.D © Times Publishing
Co.

Florida's
four-hurricane season exposed a looming threat to the state's property
insurance industry, according to industry leaders gathered for the
annual conference of the Windstorm Insurance Network.
Now
they just have to agree which threat is worst.
Is
it mold infestation, worsening by the day as damaged homes await
repair? Is it a troublesome legal climate in which, based on a recent
Florida court ruling, skittish insurers may be forced to pay policy
limits even if damage to a home was largely caused by another peril,
such as flood?
Perhaps
it's the fact that homeowners are often underinsured by tens of
thousands of dollars, putting them in a financial crunch when tragedy
strikes.
"I'd
say 80 percent of the properties I've seen are way undervalued or
underinsured," said Art Newman of Belfor, a contractor heavily
involved in repairing hurricane-damaged homes.
"I'm
doing appraisals where estimates (of insured losses) are $50,000,
$60,000 over the policy limits."
Belfor
was among nine participants in a panel discussion of lessons learned
from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne - "the Big
Four of '04" as Bill Bailey, panel moderator and special counsel
for the Insurance Information Institute, likes to call them.
Attorneys
on both sides of the fence offered their views, along with representatives
of public adjusters, building contractors, engineers and government.
Bailey,
who is co-director of a hurricane insurance information center created
in August, said the 2004 hurricane season was not a watershed like
1992, the year of Hurricane Andrew.
Post-Andrew
reforms such as higher insurance rates, higher deductibles and a
hurricane catastrophe fund (or CAT Fund) eased the pain considerably
this year. Only one overwhelmed insurer was taken over by state
regulators. And even though more than 30 insurers have filed for
rate increases or refused to write in parts of the state, there
is no widespread exodus from Florida as in 1992.
Bailey
said the multiple hurricanes show that parts of Florida's insurance
model, such as the CAT Fund and state-run Citizens Property Insurance,
need tweaking.
"The
peril is if we go too far in tweaking," he said. If, for instance,
the state pushes for a single-season deductible for hurricane insurers,
that alone could prompt a 45 percent across-the- board increase
in rates in addition to the pending rate hikes, he said.
To
Joe Adams, the biggest looming issue is "the Big M word . .
. mold."
As
an attorney concentrating on community associations, Adams represents
condominium owners and others struggling with posthurricane repairs.
Every case, he said, involves mold.
With
property values in Florida continuing to soar and consumers ignorant
of their policy limits, "I see this becoming the most litigious
issue arising out of the storms in the long haul," Adams added.
Panelists
disagreed about the wisdom of raiding the state's CAT Fund to reimburse
property owners who had to pay more than one deductible last year
when hit by two or more storms.
"I
understand the charitable point of view . . . but that's certainly
not what the CAT Fund was intended to do," said Tampa attorney
John Pappas, who spoke in defense of insurers.
Speakers
could not even agree just how far along the claims settlement process
is, nearly six months after Hurricane Charley began the barrage
of bad weather.
Several
quibbled with a report this week to the Florida Cabinet in which
Florida Chief Financial Officer Tom Gallagher's office deemed 87
percent of the 1.6-million hurricane claims had been settled.
"I
don't think it's anywhere near 80 percent, 87 percent," said
Dick Tutwiler, a Tampa public adjuster and president of the Windstorm
Insurance Network. "I just don't see it. . . . Get in a plane
. . . and see the blue tarps on houses. They're still in misery."
Tim
Marshall of Haag Engineering said his Texas-based consulting firm,
which specializes in analyzing the causes of structure failures,
is getting assignments pouring in every day and expects the volume
to continue for a year.
Bailey
said many claims may be considered "settled" if initial
checks have been cut, even if repairs haven't been made or the reimbursement
is in dispute.
"Nobody's
going to count blue roofs and say they are unsettled claims. They
just haven't been repaired," he said.
Chip
Merlin, a Tampa attorney who represents property owners in insurance
disputes, speculated Gallagher was issuing consumer- friendly numbers
"so that the next time he runs for governor, he'll have a chance
to win."
To
settle the debate, Merlin asked for a show of hands: Who thinks
that 85 percent of their cases are "settled"? Out of more
than 400 people in the room, one hand went up.
The
conference runs through Friday at the Marriott Waterside Hotel in
downtown Tampa.
Jeff
Harrington can be reached at harrington@sptimes.com or (813) 226-3407.
END/
by
Jeff Harrington, Published in The St. Petersburg Times, South
Pinellas Edition, Feb 3, 2005. pg. 1.D © Times Publishing Co.
Our clients are the insured policyholders - property owners and business owners telling the story of increased insurance settlements, full policy limits paid and successful recovery from hurricanes, fires, sinkholes, hidden decay, water and smoke damage and other property loss insurance claims and catastrophic (CAT) disasters. Examine our SUCCESS STORIES LIBRARY, PAGE
1, PAGE
2, PAGE
3, PAGE
4 and PAGE
5. You will discover you are not the only person who has had to deal
with the frustrations, the worries, and the inconvenience that follows a loss.
Call our National Toll Free Number: 1.800.321.4488
or email us
at tutwiler@publicadjuster.com. We will discuss your loss and help
ease you through your crisis.
|